Software testing is the process of evaluating an application to verify that it works as intended, identify defects, and ensure it meets requirements for quality, reliability, performance, and user experience. It includes a mix of manual and automated tests run throughout the development lifecycle so teams can release changes with confidence.
Start Today
In plain English, software testing is about checking that your software does what it’s supposed to do – and doing so before your users find out it doesn’t. It’s a quality assurance practice where testers (and often developers) validate that each feature behaves correctly and no critical bugs have been introduced. This involves executing the software in a controlled way, comparing the outcomes to expected results, and logging any issues so they can be fixed.
Modern teams approach software testing as an integral part of development, not as an afterthought. That means testing activities happen throughout the Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC), from early design discussions all the way to deployment. Various types of tests (which we’ll cover below) are used at different stages. Some tests are run manually by human QA engineers who can explore the application and spot issues that a script might miss. Other tests are automated and run by tools or scripts to quickly cover lots of scenarios. The overarching goal is simple: find and fix problems early, ensure the software meets its requirements, and ultimately deliver a high-quality product that provides a smooth experience for users.
There are many kinds of software tests, each focusing on different aspects of quality. Here are the core types of testing that QA teams typically use:
This category verifies that the software’s features function correctly. It answers the question: “Does the software do what it’s supposed to do?”
Functional testing includes things like unit tests (checking individual components or functions in isolation), integration tests (checking combinations of components to see if they work together), system tests (evaluating the application as a whole), and end-to-end tests (simulating real user workflows from start to finish).
These tests ensure the actual output matches expected outcomes for various inputs and actions.
This is the final checkpoint to determine whether the software is ready to be released to end users. Acceptance testing is often performed by a combination of QA teams, stakeholders, or even a limited set of end users. The goal is to validate the software against the business requirements and user needs. Types of acceptance tests include User Acceptance Testing (UAT) – where actual users or clients test the software in a real-world usage scenario to make sure it solves their problems – as well as beta testing (releasing the product to a small beta group for feedback in a real environment) and field testing or production testing (trying the software in a production-like environment).
If the software passes acceptance criteria (i.e., the key stakeholders or users give the thumbs up), then it’s deemed ready for launch.
These tests evaluate how well the software works, focusing on qualities beyond basic correctness. For example, performance testing checks how fast and responsive the system is under different conditions, and load/stress testing sees how the application behaves under heavy usage or extreme conditions (will it slow down or crash if 10,000 users log in at once?).
Security testing probes for vulnerabilities to ensure data and functionality are protected. Usability testing gauges how user-friendly and intuitive the software is, and compatibility testing verifies the software works across different devices, browsers, operating systems, or configurations. Non-functional tests make sure the software not only works, but works well under real-world conditions.
Software is always changing – new features are added, bugs are fixed, code is refactored. Regression testing involves re-running tests on the unchanged parts of the software to confirm that new updates haven’t broken anything that was previously working. It’s basically a safety net of test cases that “regress” over the application to catch unintended side effects. For example, if you update the login module, regression tests would verify that other features like account settings or shopping cart (which might rely on login) still work as before.
Teams often maintain a regression test suite (a collection of many test cases) and run it whenever code changes are deployed. Tip: Because regression suites can become large, they are prime candidates for automation. (For a deeper dive into this topic, see our in-depth guide on regression testing.)
Modern QA employs both manual and automated testing, each with its strengths. It’s not an either/or choice – effective testing strategies find the right balance between the two.
Human-driven testing. This is when QA engineers (or sometimes developers/product managers) manually operate the software, click through user flows, input data, and observe the results. Manual testing is essential for exploratory testing, where the tester creatively explores the application to uncover unexpected issues. It’s also crucial for assessing user experience (UX) and usability – for instance, a human can notice if a workflow is confusing or if a button is misaligned, which an automated script wouldn’t perceive. Manual testing shines in areas that require human intuition, visual verification, or ad-hoc exploration (such as trying odd combinations of actions or observing the look-and-feel). It’s often used for test scenarios that are hard to automate or only need to be run once in a while.
Tool-driven testing. This uses scripts and software tools to run tests automatically without human intervention. Automated testing is fantastic for repetitive, regression-heavy tasks. For example, instead of a person manually clicking through the same 100 test cases after every code change, you can write automated tests to do it in a fraction of the time. Automation is commonly applied to unit tests (developers often write scripts to test their code modules), integration and API tests, and regression test suites. It’s also used for smoke tests – quick checks that core features still work whenever a new build is made. Automated tests are a cornerstone of continuous integration/continuous delivery (CI/CD) pipelines: every time developers merge code, a suite of automated tests can run to catch issues immediately. By leveraging test automation frameworks (like Selenium for web UI testing, JUnit or PyTest for unit testing, etc.), teams get fast feedback on each build. The upside is speed and consistency – automated tests can run 24/7 and are less prone to human error. However, they require an upfront investment to write and maintain the scripts. The best practice is to automate as many repetitive tests as possible, while reserving human effort for high-value exploratory and usability testing.
In the past, testing often happened late in the development process – typically after all coding was “done,” a separate QA team would come in to test the product. Modern approaches have turned this on its head by pushing testing earlier in the lifecycle, a concept known as “shift-left” testing. In Agile and DevOps environments, testing is not a one-time phase but a continuous activity woven into every stage of the SDLC.
Shift-left testing in Agile/DevOps: Shifting testing to the left means involving QA from day one. Rather than waiting until a feature is completed, testing-related thinking starts as soon as requirements are defined. For example, QA engineers (or developers in a testing role) might participate in design discussions and identify how a feature will be tested. Test cases can be designed while the code is being written. In Agile teams, it’s common for testers and developers to work side by side each sprint, so that each new feature or user story has corresponding tests written for it immediately. This proactive approach catches issues much sooner. In fact, IBM research famously found that a bug caught during the design phase might be 100 times cheaper to fix than a bug found after release.
Testing at every stage: Throughout the development lifecycle, different kinds of tests come into play. During development, developers run unit tests on their code and perhaps peer review each other’s code (which can be seen as a form of testing). As components are integrated, integration tests check that those pieces work together. When a feature is deemed “dev complete,” QA might perform system testing on it in a staging environment. Before a release, a round of regression testing (often automated) runs to ensure new changes haven’t broken existing functionality. And even after release, some teams do post-release testing or monitoring in production (sometimes called “shift-right” practices, like A/B testing or chaos engineering, but that’s another story). The key is that testing isn’t a single box to check—it’s a thread running through the entire SDLC, ensuring quality at each step.
Continuous testing and CI/CD: In a DevOps culture with CI/CD pipelines, testing becomes part of the automated workflow. Every time code is merged or deployed to a test environment, a suite of tests runs automatically. These act as quality gates in the pipeline – if a critical test fails, the pipeline can stop the deployment, preventing bad code from moving forward. For example, if a new commit causes 5 out of 1000 regression tests to fail, the CI system will flag it and developers can address the issue immediately, rather than discovering it days or weeks later. Continuous testing gives teams rapid feedback. It reduces the dreaded “big bang” testing at the end of a project because testing has been happening continuously. This not only speeds up releases (since you’re not delaying to fix a pile of late-discovered bugs) but also improves quality. By the time you’re ready to go live, you have high confidence because the code has passed all these incremental tests along the way.
Having a bunch of tests is good, but having a strategy for your testing is even better. A solid software testing strategy makes sure you’re using your resources wisely and focusing on the right things. Here are key considerations when designing your testing strategy:
Focus on High-Risk and Critical Areas: It’s usually not feasible to test everything, so you need to prioritize. A risk-based approach means identifying the parts of your software that are most critical to the business or most likely to fail. Consider what user journeys are most common or most important – those “critical paths” should be heavily tested. Use insights from production and analytics: which features do users use the most? If 80% of users rely on 5 core features, those features deserve a lot of testing attention. Also look at historical failure data – if certain modules have been buggy in the past, they might need extra tests now. By focusing on high-risk areas (like a payment processing module in an e-commerce app, or the data sync feature in a finance app), you ensure that testing efforts are concentrated where problems would hurt the most. Lower-risk areas still get tested, but in proportion to their importance.
Balance Coverage and Speed: One of the trickiest parts of a test strategy is deciding how much is “enough.” In theory, you’d love to have 100% test coverage (meaning every line of code or every use case is tested), but in practice that’s rarely achievable – and chasing 100% could slow development to a crawl. You have to balance the depth and breadth of testing with the need to release software in a timely manner. As part of your strategy, set test coverage goals that make sense for your context (for example, maybe aim for 80% of critical flows covered by automated tests, or a certain percentage of code coverage from unit tests). Consider the speed and cost implications: extensive manual testing might catch everything, but it could take too long; extensive automation might be fast to execute but takes time to develop and maintain. Decide where automation gives you the best ROI – regression tests and high-frequency scenarios are usually good candidates. In areas that are low-risk or change very rarely, you might be comfortable with minimal testing to save time. The strategy should outline this balance: which areas will get heavy automated coverage, which will rely on manual exploratory testing, and how you’ll ensure testing doesn’t become a bottleneck for releases.
Test Environments and Data Management: A often overlooked part of strategy is ensuring you have the right environment and test data to test effectively. A test is only as good as the environment it runs in. If your testing environment is drastically different from production (say, using different configurations, smaller databases, etc.), you might miss issues that only occur in the real setup. So plan to have staging or test environments that closely mirror production in infrastructure and settings. Equally important is managing test data. You’ll want data sets that are realistic – for example, a variety of user accounts, transactions, or records that simulate actual usage. If you only test with “happy path” data (like one admin user and one sample record), you could miss problems that occur with more complex or large data sets. Strategize how to get and refresh this data: you might anonymize a copy of production data for testing, or use data generation tools to create diverse test data. Also, consider automating the setup and teardown of test data as part of your tests (so tests can create the data they need, then clean up). Good environment and data management prevents a lot of headaches like tests failing due to environment issues or not catching bugs due to unrealistic data. It makes your testing more reliable and meaningful.
Even with a great strategy, teams often encounter common hurdles in their testing efforts. Being aware of these challenges can help you mitigate them:
Flaky Tests and Unstable Environments: A flaky test is an automated test that sometimes passes and sometimes fails even when the code hasn’t changed, often due to issues like timing, concurrency, or environment instability. Flaky tests are the bane of QA automation – they can erode trust in the test suite because you’re never sure if a failure indicates a real bug or just a test hiccup. Similarly, if your test environment (servers, test data, etc.) is not stable or consistently available, tests might fail for reasons unrelated to the code. Dealing with this is critical: teams need to invest time in stabilizing tests and environments. This might mean adding proper waits or retries in tests, improving how test data is set up, or ensuring the test environment is as reliable as production. The effort is worth it – it reduces false alarms and wasted time. (To give a sense of scope: some industry studies estimate that 15–30% of automated test failures are due to flaky tests rather than actual software bugs).
Gaps in Coverage (Untested Scenarios): It’s common to discover after a bug hits production that there was simply no test covering that scenario. Maybe the scenario was an edge case no one thought of, or maybe a feature was developed under time pressure and never got proper tests. Gaps in test coverage, especially around critical workflows, are a major challenge. They often occur because of evolving software (new features added that aren’t yet in the test plan), miscommunication (assuming “someone else” tested that scenario), or lack of time/resources. The result, however, is the same: an important scenario goes untested and a bug sneaks through. The best way to tackle this is by regularly reviewing and updating your test cases. Whenever a new feature is added, plan its tests. If a production incident occurs, add a test to cover that case in the future. Some teams use techniques like requirements traceability (mapping tests to specific requirements or user stories) to ensure coverage, or analytics to see what paths users take through the app so they can test those paths thoroughly. It’s impossible to have zero gaps, but you can minimize them by being methodical about test case design and constantly learning from past escapes.
Slow Test Suites Blocking Releases: Another challenge appears when your test suite becomes large and slow to run. If running all your tests takes many hours, it can impede the team’s agility. Developers might merge code and then wait until next day to see results, or worse, they might start skipping tests due to time constraints (“We’ll just test these few things for now, and run the full suite later”). A slow feedback loop can discourage thorough testing and delay releases. This is often a growing pain as a project matures: tests accumulate and what used to run in 5 minutes now takes 2 hours. To combat this, teams need to optimize test execution. Strategies include running tests in parallel (e.g., split tests across multiple machines or threads), optimizing test code (perhaps some tests are doing redundant setup or not cleaned up properly causing slowdowns), and culling or refactoring tests that are no longer providing value. It may also involve smarter test selection – for instance, running a quick subset of smoke tests on each code commit, and a full regression only nightly or on a specific schedule. The aim is to keep the feedback loop fast. In a well-tuned setup, a developer can get test results in minutes, not hours. Fast tests mean you can run them more often, catch issues sooner, and keep up a high development velocity without sacrificing quality.
Siloed QA vs. Integrated Quality Culture: A more cultural challenge is how the organization views testing. In some setups, the development team writes code and “throws it over the wall” to a separate QA team for testing. This siloed approach can create a mentality where developers feel quality is not their problem (“that’s QA’s job”), and testers feel detached from the development process. It often results in late discovery of issues and sometimes adversarial dynamics (“QA is always finding problems” vs. “dev is always introducing bugs”). Modern best practices strongly favor a more integrated quality culture. This means everyone involved in the project shares responsibility for quality. Developers write tests and care about the results, testers are involved early and have input during development, and product owners prioritize quality alongside features. When QA is integrated, testing becomes a collaborative feedback loop rather than a last gatekeeper. If you currently face a siloed situation, bridging that gap is important: encourage communication between devs and QA, perhaps adopt practices like behaviour-driven development (BDD) where devs and QA define tests together, or have QA sit in on daily standups to stay aligned. Breaking down the silos leads to faster issue resolution and a higher overall commitment to quality. In an integrated culture, the question shifts from “did QA sign off on this release?” to “does the team as a whole have confidence in this release?”
At Total Perform, software quality isn’t an afterthought – it’s our core focus. Our company was originally founded as Total Performance Consulting back in 2005, which means we’ve been immersed in QA and performance engineering for nearly two decades. Over the years, our testing specialists have seen just about every challenge in the book, from helping a startup set up its very first suite of tests, to scaling out a continuous testing program for an enterprise with thousands of daily users. We bring that deep well of experience to every new project, knowing what works, what pitfalls to avoid, and how to tailor best practices to each team’s unique needs.
Comprehensive QA services: We offer a full spectrum of software testing and quality assurance services that can be customized to your situation. Need to establish a coherent testing strategy and process from scratch? We’ll work with you to craft a QA strategy and roadmap that aligns with your business goals. Want to speed up delivery? Our engineers can design and implement test automation frameworks and build robust regression test suites to run in your CI/CD pipeline. Concerned about performance or security? We conduct thorough performance testing (including load and stress tests) and security testing to harden your application. And if you’re short on hands, we provide QA team augmentation – including nearshore QA squads that can integrate with your team in your time zone. In fact, many clients choose our nearshore teams to get a dedicated group of testers who ramp up quickly and collaborate seamlessly with their in-house developers. Whether you need a few extra QA engineers or an entire outsourced QA department, we’ve got you covered.
Flexible engagement, seamless integration: One thing that sets Total Perform apart is how we embed into your workflow. Our goal is to plug into your SDLC in the way that makes the most sense for you. For some clients, we embed our experts directly into their Agile scrum teams – our QA specialists sit in daily stand-ups, work in the same sprints as your developers, and test new features in real-time as they’re built. For others, we operate as a dedicated QA team running in parallel – we take on all testing responsibilities and deliver thorough reports, while coordinating closely with your dev and product leads. We also offer high-level QA advisory services, where we assess and improve your existing QA processes (kind of like QA consultants who provide a blueprint and mentorship for your in-house team). This flexibility means we can support a variety of delivery models: whether you’re doing Scrum, Kanban, DevOps continuous delivery, or more traditional cycles, we adjust our approach accordingly. In every case, our mission is the same: to ensure that quality practices are seamlessly integrated into your development lifecycle. We don’t just parachute in at the end – we work alongside your team, using our expertise to strengthen quality at each step. The end result is that you can release software with confidence, knowing it’s been rigorously tested and validated by experienced professionals.
QA & Testing Maturity Assessment: First, understand where you currently stand. In a maturity assessment, our experts review your existing QA processes, tools, test coverage, and team skills. We’ll evaluate how your testing currently operates – for example, do you have a documented test strategy? How effective are your tests at catching issues? How do you measure quality? This assessment identifies gaps and areas of improvement, whether it’s missing types of tests (perhaps you have no automated tests, or you haven’t been doing performance testing), inefficient workflows, or outdated tools. You’ll receive a clear report of findings and a tailored roadmap to advance to the next level of testing maturity. It’s essentially a baseline check-up for your QA practice, giving you insight into what to prioritize for better quality outcomes.
Pilot Engagement: Once you know your gaps, it’s often helpful to tackle one high-impact area as a pilot project. The idea of a pilot engagement is to demonstrate quick value and build momentum. For instance, if you lack automation, we might help you kickstart a regression test automation project for one module of your application – after a few weeks, you’ll see faster test cycles and fewer repeated bugs in that area. Or maybe performance has been a pain point; we could do a focused performance testing initiative on a critical service to uncover bottlenecks and show how tuning can improve response times. Another example pilot is a QA process audit and improvement for one team or project, implementing best practices and measuring the improvement in defect rates. By starting with a pilot, you get tangible results early, which can justify broader roll-outs. It’s like a proof-of-concept for what better testing can do for your team.
By taking these steps, you’ll be well on your way to elevating your software testing maturity and reaping the benefits in terms of quality and velocity. And you don’t have to do it alone – our team is here to guide and support you through each stage of the improvement journey.
Reach out to start the conversation.
SCHEDULE A CALL
Nearshore teams that onboard fast, collaborate deeply, and build better products.
